INSIDE THE LAAGER
Blood River has one very important significance; it gave the world the word ‘laager’, which today has more to do with attitudes than military strategy – the same attitude that has taught generations of South Africans a version of their past which has suited the strong at the expense of the weak. This version has cherished the popular view of Bible-clutching Boers taking righteous revenge against the Zulu who had wickedly murdered one of their leaders, Piet Retief, after ceding to him vast areas of their land in a document that modern researchers believe never existed. Even if it had, could the Zulu king Dingane, reared in a society based on community ownership of land, really have understood what he was signing?
Yet another version of the same historical attitude would have us believe that the land claimed by the Voortrekkers, particularly on the highveld, was empty, having been depopulated during years of warfare as the Zulu kingdom struggled to assert itself in what is now Natal.
A MORE BALANCED PICTURE
History and nationalism are, perhaps, natural bedfellows; an almost daily reaffirmation of the right to be proud to exist. But history has many memories and many versions; one person’s beliefs may be another’s lies; today’s truth may be tomorrow’s fiction. A child who thrilled to the tale of stern Voortrekkers mowing down Zulu hordes may grow into an adult in search of a more balanced picture: who were the Zulu, and why did they attack so desperately and in such suicidal numbers? Why are some of them still fighting today, and why do they need to…? How did the early Khoikhoi react when Jan van Riebeeck started to build a fort on land they had always regarded as their own…? Why did the ANC, once regarded by many Africans as too moderate, turn to violence? And perhaps the most difficult question of all: both Conservative Party leader Andries Treurnicht and ANC leader Nelson Mandela would doubtless claim to be South African patriots. Which one would you believe?
There is more to the creation of a nationalist history than the sympathetic interpretation of events. There is also that most insidious of propaganda weapons, omission. So that while every schoolchild learns about Union, how many learn of desperate black efforts to be part of it? And while we all know about the bravery (and bravery it undoubtedly was) of the trekkers, what do we really know of the other great trek – when millions of black people were uprooted from their homes by apartheid legislation?
It is questions like these that this book seeks to answer… and never in the troubled and turbulent history of South Africa have the answers been so important.
THE VIEW FROM SOUTH AFRICA
Over the past few years the academic view of South African history has undergone a radical change; questing minds in universities both in South Africa and overseas have been researching a new view of our past – the view from South Africa, not from Europe. A view that asserts that South African history did not begin with the discovery of the country by the Portuguese. What about the people who had lived on the shores of Table Bay for centuries? How could Europeans have discovered a land that was already settled? In their quest for the truth nothing is taken for granted, and one by one many of the beliefs that are central to the traditional view of South African history are coming under the spotlight, and if they do not fit the facts, out they go. Even the vow that the Voortrekkers are believed to have made before the Battle of Blood River has been called into question.
From this research has come repeated calls for a new history of our country, a book that tells the real story of South Africa, a story uncluttered by nationalism, imperialism or, indeed, any other ‘isms’…. And what an exciting story that has turned out to be. True, we may not have our lordly declarations of independence, but we have action, deviousness, and enough characters to fill a library of skop-skiet-en-donder novels. The motivation for our book may have begun in the hallowed halls of our universities, but the story has been told in a way that everyone will find readable. Inevitably, in presenting a broader, more balanced view of South African history, this book will question, and in many cases overturn, long-held beliefs and cherished myths. We make no apologies for this; a better understanding of our past will surely help us interpret our present, and prepare us to face the enormous challenges of South Africa’s future.
Here, then, is the real story of South Africa’s past….
This is a modified extract from the following source: Oakes, D., 1988. Reader’s Digest Illustrated History of South Africa. 2nd ed. Published by: Reader’s Digest Association, Cape Town.
If you would like to contribute to this archive or to a specific document please contact us.